and we have ‘no plans to revisit work’. This was the National Audit Office’s response to a Freedom of Information Request to my colleague Joan Crawford on February 18th 2020 http://FOI-1298. The NAO’s response continues our ‘purpose was to establish the relevant facts’ with regards to waiting times. The NAO adds it was these concerns expressed by an NHS staff member that first led to the NAO inquiry. Curiously the NAO then says it was planned to describe the responsibilities of different health sector bodies ‘in assuring and overseeing the accuracy and integrity of the reported data’ but the NAO has never addressed the ‘integrity’ of the data. The NAO has failed to tell anyone that the unit of analysis in IAPT’s own data set, the proportion of people who recover, is suspect. Whilst IAPT claims a 50% recovery rate my own independent analysis submitted to the NAO suggests it is just 10%. The NAO curtailed its’ investigation in June 2018 because of ‘changing priorities’, leaving its’ findings unpublished and duties undischarged. There is a pressing need for independent audit.
On the same day as the FOI response, the Government announced that it will spend £2.6 billion over 6 years on flood defences and that every £1 spent will save £8. However the UK Government has failed to ensure that the NAO furnishes it with similar data. Without such data there is no real world accountability.
Dr Mike Scott
One reply on “£4 billion Spent On IAPT and National Audit Office Says ‘Value For Money’ Is Not Our Concern”
Dr Keith Geraghty @keithgeraghty £millions are being spent testing a CBT-Model treatment of Medically Unexplained Symptoms eg in Sheffield & PRINCE Trial London. I started a review of the Model Underpinning the Treatment Model (finding major flaws in whole approach) https://sheffield.ac.uk/scharr/research/centres/ctru/mss3#Video…