Categories
l

“IAPT The Myth and The Reality” Scuppered By Two BABCP Presidents

last week I received an extraordinary e-mail, not from the editor of CBT Today, to whom I had submitted the aforementioned article, but from the President of the British Association of Behavioural and Cognitive Therapies (BABCP), Paul Salkovskis and the President-Elect, Andrew Beck declining my article. I protested that this was an infringement of editorial freedom. Further there was a conflict of interest (COI)  because my article was written in response to one by Paul extolling the virtues of IAPT.  This issue of editorial interference was highlighted a year ago when the Editor of CBT Today and Paul declared that there would be no further discussion of IAPT following a piece by Jason Roscoe ‘Has IAPT Become A Bit Like Frankenstein’s Monster?’  and a rebuttal by David Clark. In a response Andrew Beck has now agreed to take the issues of editorial freedom and conflict of interests to the BABCP Board. But this also happened 5 years ago under the Chris William’s Presidency, to no effect!

 the then President sent me an e-mail on December 16th 2015 which read:

‘I don’t want to pre-empt what the Board might decide – as I am only one member of that board – however I am the Board member on the journal committee and am personally very keen we have clear COI statements. My own view is that probably most of these authors doing research in IAPT and also employed in such services aren’t even considering this as an issue as they don’t see themselves as being influenced by IAPT centrally – however that isn’t the point. What matters is perceived conflict and it’s quite clear that you and at least some others have a concern. I would be very happy on a personal basis to advocate we remind authors and associate editors of COI more in such cases and will do so in person or by email at the next journal committee meeting and provide you with feedback as to what happens then’ 

The IAPT Skulduggery Has Continued 

In answer to Jason Roscoe’s question ‘Has IAPT Become A Frankenstein’s Monster? ” –  I  can answer in the affirmative – the latest issue of the British Journal of Clinical  Psychology DOI:10.1111/bjc.12259 contains a supposed 10 year review of IAPT data. The authors all declare no conflict of interest, but the corresponding author for the study is Stephen Kellet who is an IAPT Programme Director! 

Other Examples of IAPT’s ‘Failure To Declare’

  1. In an article that mirrors the Kellett et al paper,  by the prime lead in IAPT David Clark, in the Lancet (2018) https://www.dropbox.com/s/s7var6llzwt1otd/IAPT%20and%20Transparency%20Clark%202018.pdf?dl=0 there was no declaration of a conflict of interest. Ironically the title has in it the word ‘Transparency’!
  2.  In a paper by Boyd, Baker and Reilly (2019) https://www.dropbox.com/s/q1120m0cbvqb882/IAPT%20Stepped%20care%20model%202019.pdf?dl=0 interventions it is written ‘The authors have declared that no competing interests exist’ , but the lead author presenting at a Conference in Amsterdam in May 2016 is described thus: ‘Lisa Boyd, IAPT service, Tees Esk and Wear Valley Mental Health Trust, UK Impact of a Progressive Stepped Care Approach in an Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Service: An Observational Study’
  3. In the paper ‘How durable is the effect of low intensity CBT for depression and anxiety? Remission and relapse in a longitudinal cohort study’ was written by Ali et al (2017) , Behaviour Research and Therapy 94 1-8. the authors declared no conflict of interest but the corresponding author was Chair of the Northern IAPT Practice Research Network

Enough is enough the very credibility of BABCP is at stake and as for IAPT! But I guess this blog would be found ‘unsuitable’ for CBT Today!

Ethical standards have become a joke

Dr Mike Scott

 

 

415 replies on ““IAPT The Myth and The Reality” Scuppered By Two BABCP Presidents”

Hi Michael
I totally sympathise with Elizabeth Cotton, trying to get space to express a critical voice of IAPT is near impossible. There is I think a cultural groupthink around IAPT, which runs the most important thing is that we acknowledge the extent of mental health issues do not blame the sufferer and the more we fund mental health the better things will be. To suggest there are other valid concerns invites dismissal with an implication that you are not against stigmatisation and don’t recognise that mental health has been a Cinderella service.
Mike

By Post Author

I am really impressed with your writing skills as well as with the layout on your weblog.

Is this a paid theme or did you modify it yourself?
Anyway keep up the nice quality writing, it is rare to see a nice blog like this one nowadays.

rexall pharmacy amoxicillin 500mg: – amoxicillin 500 mg purchase without prescription

күш кеш көш, дос туралы жанылтпаш байтерек алматы учебный центр,
иш байтерек алматы узак жол
тест, педагогика психология тест сұрақтары жауаптарымен 2022 не приходит смс с кодом подтверждения каспи, не приходит код
подтверждения

ставки казино, олимп казино кеңірдекке ауа түсетін тесік, тыныс алу дегеніміз оттегінің снять жилье в боровом
недорого, снять квартиру в боровом мектепте қалыптасқан
тәрбие жұмысының жүйесі, мектептің тәрбие жұмысы
жоспары

келл фактор что это, келл отрицательный что значит куплю дом в лесу акмолинской области в совхозах или районов,
купить дом в акмолинской области
leadbros стиральная машина производитель, leadbros морозильник отзывы ашамайға мінгізу сценарий,
ашамайға мінгізу салтты өткізудің
нұсқаулығын жаса

Comments are closed.