Skip to the content
CBT Watch
CBT Watch: An Independent Mental Health Watchdog & Discussion Forum
  • Home
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Topics
  • Home
  • About
  • Forum
  • Contact
  • Topics
  • Twitter

Tag: Unreliable goal setting interview

Categories
BABCP Response - NICE Consultation January 2022

Testing For Mental Health Is A Token Gesture Compared to Testing For The Corona Virus

  • Post author By admin
  • Post date 3rd June 2020
  • No Comments on Testing For Mental Health Is A Token Gesture Compared to Testing For The Corona Virus

Nobody doubts that testing for the the Corona virus is a necessary part of the treatment planning for those with a fever and persistent cough. However the test alone is not judged sufficient, it has to be complemented by other clues such as the result of X-rays, a CT scan, and consideration of whole range of Covid-19 symptoms before the clinician makes a judgement on diagnosis. This contrasts sorely with the position in routine mental health services where in the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) service the sole arbiter of treatment decision making and judgement of outcome is the PHQ9/GAD7, accompanied by an unbridled clinical judgement. Yet the authors of the PHQ9 [Kroenke et al (2001 )] and GAD7 [Spitzer et al (2006)] insisted that the tests results needed to be interpreted in the context of a diagnostic interview. 

The completion of the PHQ9/GAD7 is mandated by the IAPT hierarchy, but clinicians have little or no interest in the results except that they may be disciplined if there is a pattern of non-recovery on these measures. IAPT Psychological Wellbeing Practitioners were asked to identify potential clients with GAD ( a score of 10 or more on the GAD7 ) for a study Kalpakidou et al (2019) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3385-5  comparing the efficacy of CBT (delivered by high intensity therapists) to medication. But they put too few clients (only 12% of those potentially eligible) forward that the trial was cancelled. The take home message appears to be that for clinical purposes PWPS don’t take PHQ9/GAD7 measures seriously and operate on the basis of their own clinical judgement e.g whether a client’s stress is just a  natural reaction to a difficult situation or whether simple psychological first aid is judged sufficient to address difficulties. There appears to be little believe in the importance of stepping up clients and indeed only 10% of clients are stepped up. 

The judgement of PWP’s ( who provide over 70% of IAPT contacts) will likely be influenced by their training, the focus of which is on goal setting and tackling the most important problem see Richards and Whyte (2011) Reach Out 3rd Edition. But PWP’s are painfully unaware that such interviews have no more reliability that the standard open ended psychiatric interview with at most a 1 in 2 chance that different assessors seeing the same interview would agree  on the way forward [see Spitzer RL, Fleiss JL. A re-analysis of the reliability of psychiatric diagnosis. Br J Psychiatry 1974;125(0):341–7]. Essentially judgements are idiosyncratic unless a standardised semi-structured interview such as the SCID, DIAMOND or MINI is included in the assessment. Without such reliable assessments PWPs are operating outside the sphere of evidence based interventions.

Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1092-1097.

Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606-613.

Dr Mike Scott

The First Step Questionnaire Revised”
 
 

Post navigation

 

 

 

Like Loading...
  • Tags IAPT, Psychological Wellbeing Practitioners, Psychometric test token gesture, Unreliable goal setting interview
  • Twitter
  • Twitter

Subscribe to CBT Watch

Enter your email address here to be notified when new posts are published. Your email address will not be used for any other reason.

Recent Posts

  • NHS Talking Therapies – Wasting Access to Psychological Therapy
  • In NHS Talking Therapies We Doubt
  • NHS Talking Therapies – Doublethink Without Informed Consent
  • The Gagging of NHS Talking Therapy Clients
  • Why Is NHS Talking Therapy The Only Unregulated NHS Service?

Categories

  • Abuse of Power
  • BABCP Response – NICE Consultation January 2022
  • Current Psychological Therapy Issues
  • Group CBT
  • IAPT
  • Resources
  • Safe Space for CBT Therapists
  • Wounded Healer

Recent Comments

  • admin on NHS Talking Therapies – Wasting Access to Psychological Therapy
  • Topher on NHS Talking Therapies – Wasting Access to Psychological Therapy
  • Homepage on The Scientist Practitioner Delusion?
  • URL on The Department of Health Has Failed To Regulate Routine Mental Health Services
  • URL on A Psychological Wellbeing Practitioner’s Damning Indictment of Her Role

Archives

  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

RSS CBT News & Research

© 2023 CBT Watch

Powered by WordPress

To the top ↑ Up ↑
%d bloggers like this: