no one is available to answer, why over £4billion has been spent on the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) service without independent evaluation. There should be a call to action when the best available evidence indicates that only the tip of the iceberg of IAPT client’s recover https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105318755264. Which Government Minister is responsible? Does responsibility lie with Public Health England or NHS England? Are Clinical Commissiong Groups (CCG’s) simply acting under orders?
It is not good enough for the architects of the IAPT service to blandly assert it is a ‘world beater’. There is no transparency with regards to decision making and implementation in IAPT. In the 3 years of cbtwatch no public powerholder has deigned to answer the concerns raised. Media pressure did however evoke a response by IAPT’s, public advocates, Professors Clark and Salkovskis, who are hardly disinterested commentators, albeit that they are persuaders par excellence. Ministers, Public Health England and NHS England have maintained a deafening silence.
Interestingly the failure in transparency over IAPT resembles that of the handling of the pandemic. It is it seems impossible to discover who postponed testing. There has been a parallel failure, over the last decade to publicly and independently test out recovery rates in IAPT. My own findings are that the tip of the iceberg of service users get back to their usual selves.
We seem destined to go from one fiasco to another, but all it needs to avoid this scenario is honesty and care, it is fundamentally an ethical matter. This could start by taking the time to listen to what IAPT client’s are saying and to IAPT front line workers.
Dr Mike Scott
One reply on “The IAPT Fiasco – A Failure of Governance Over Talking Therapies”
Paper on Canadian services, critical of IAPT framework.